[Atmob-discuss] IC 405-410-417

[Paul A. Valleli]

Petur,
Now you are getting into the  realm of artistic
opinion and values.
I see the smoother dynamic range of the second image
but find the first image more impressive.
Is this the same Zone System that professional
Robert White of Arlington advocated about three or
four decades ago ?
Paul
 
---- Original message ----

  Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:58:50 -0500
  From: "Nielsen, Gunnlaugur Petur,Md"
  <GNIELSEN at PARTNERS.ORG>
  Subject: [Atmob-discuss] IC 405-410-417
  To: <atmob-discuss at atmob.org>
  >I've been reading the "zone system" book for
  processing astro images
  >
  >http://www.newastro.com/zone/
  >
  >really good for beginners like me - recommend it
  to anyone starting out
  >
  >So my first try using the new info was re-doing
  one of my images.
  >
  >This is what it looked like "before the zone"
  >
  >http://astro.bsd.is/IC405.html
  >
  >and this is "after the zone"
  >
  >http://astro.bsd.is/IC405L.html
  >
  >I like the latter one much better !!
  >
  >Petur
  >
  >The information transmitted in this electronic
  communication is intended only
  >for the person or entity to whom it is addressed
  and may contain confidential
  >and/or privileged material. Any review,
  retransmission, dissemination or other
  >use of or taking of any action in reliance upon
  this information by persons or
  >entities other than the intended recipient is
  prohibited. If you received this
  >information in error, please contact the
  Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and
  >properly dispose of this information.
  >
  >
  >_______________________________________________
  >Atmob-discuss mailing list
  >Atmob-discuss at atmob.org
  >http://lists.atmob.org/mailman/listinfo/atmob-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atmob.org/pipermail/atmob-discuss/attachments/20080130/497c083d/attachment.html